Why VAR was wrong to allow Man City’s 2nd vs. Fulham
Kosport Magazine – May 6, 2024
In the world of sports, technology has become an integral part of the game. From instant replays to goal-line technology, it has been implemented to ensure fair play and accurate decisions. However, the recent use of VAR (Video Assistant Referee) in the Premier League has sparked controversy and debate.
During the match between Manchester City and Fulham, VAR was used to review a goal scored by Nathan Ake. The decision to allow the goal to stand has been met with criticism, and for good reason. As the General Editor of Kosport Magazine, I believe that VAR was wrong to allow Man City’s 2nd goal against Fulham.
The use of VAR is meant to correct clear and obvious errors made by the on-field officials. However, in this case, it only added to the confusion and frustration of both teams and fans. The goal in question was scored from a corner kick, and upon review, it was clear that Ake had pushed his defender before heading the ball into the net. This should have been a clear foul and the goal should not have been allowed.
But what is even more concerning is the lack of consistency in the use of VAR. In previous matches, similar incidents have been reviewed and disallowed. So why was this goal allowed to stand? It raises questions about the reliability and effectiveness of VAR in the Premier League.
Kosport Magazine believes that the use of technology should not take away from the human element of the game. Referees are trained professionals who make split-second decisions on the field. VAR should only be used as a tool to assist them, not to overrule their decisions.
A New Perspective on Refereeing
In an effort to provide more insight into the world of officiating, the Premier League has introduced a new initiative. Referee Jarred Gillett will wear a head-mounted device, known as “RefCam,” during the match between Crystal Palace and Manchester United. This will give viewers a first-hand look at how decisions are made and how officials interact with players.
While this may seem like a step in the right direction, it also raises concerns about the privacy and pressure on referees. Refereeing is a difficult job, and having every move recorded and scrutinized can add unnecessary stress and criticism.
Kosport Magazine believes that instead of focusing on the referee’s perspective, the Premier League should focus on improving the overall consistency and accuracy of VAR. This can be achieved through better training and communication between on-field officials and the VAR team.
In conclusion, the use of VAR in the Premier League has been a controversial topic, and the decision to allow Man City’s 2nd goal against Fulham only adds to the debate. While technology has its place in sports, it should not be used to override the decisions of trained professionals. The focus should be on improving the overall effectiveness and consistency of VAR, rather than trying to capture every moment of the game through “RefCam.”
Summary
Kosport Magazine believes that VAR was wrong to allow Man City’s 2nd goal against Fulham. The use of technology should not take away from the human element of the game, and the lack of consistency in its use raises concerns about its reliability. While the Premier League’s new initiative to provide a referee’s perspective is a step in the right direction, the focus should be on improving the overall effectiveness and consistency of VAR.
